United States Courts
United States Courts
  • 439
  • 4 355 817
In Session Episode 39: Trust and Relationships: The Science May Surprise You
In Session Episode 39: Trust and Relationships: The Science May Surprise You
Episode 39: Dr. Peter H. Kim, researcher in the field of trust and author of How Trust Works: The Science of How Relationships Are Built, Broken and Repaired, shares surprising evidence-based insights about trust and trust violations. He describes how efforts to repair trust, such as apologies, can be ineffective or even harm relationships.
Dr. Peter H. Kim is a professor of management and organization at the University of Southern California’s Marshall School of Business and is a recipient of numerous international and international awards. His research has been published in a number of scholarly journals, and featured in The New York Times, The Washington Post and on National Public Radio.
In Session: Leading the Judiciary is an audio podcast designed to bring cutting-edge thinking about public and private-sector leadership to the attention of judiciary executives. Each episode includes a conversation with one or more thought leaders whose research and expertise are relevant to the work of executives in the federal courts.
Переглядів: 132

Відео

In Session: Leading the Judiciary - Episode 38: How Office Design Can Improve Wellbeing,
Переглядів 3062 місяці тому
In Session: Leading the Judiciary - Episode 38: How Office Design Can Improve Wellbeing, Productivity & Resilience A transcript of this podcast is available at fjc.dcn/sites/default/files/materials/40/Transcript_In Session_Leading the Judiciary - Episode 38.pdf Episode 38: Dr. Esther Sternberg, author of Well at Work: Creating Wellbeing in Any Workspace, shares research on how our work environm...
BONUS Off Paper Podcast: Episode 25 - Finding Happiness in Your Life and Work
Переглядів 1502 місяці тому
BONUS Off Paper Podcast: Episode 25 - Finding Happiness in Your Life and Work Episode 25: Helene Creager (C.D. Cal.), informed by her time as central California’s Critical Incident Stress Management Team, shares not only what officers need to know about the science behind mindfulness, compassion, self-compassion, and positive neuroplasticity, but how to incorporate them into our daily lives as ...
Judge Aleta Trauger Opened Doors for Women in Law
Переглядів 1,1 тис.3 місяці тому
Aleta A. Trauger earned a reputation as a tough prosecutor after convicting a former Tennessee governor during her stint at the U.S. attorney’s office. The 1981 case, which dealt with selling liquor licenses to political friends, gave her credibility in a male-dominated space. “It really set me up as a woman who was tough and could do litigation,” said Judge Trauger, who serves in the Middle Di...
USSC Public Meeting - March 6, 2024
Переглядів 5023 місяці тому
Pursuant to Rule 3.2 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the United States Sentencing Commission, a public hearing was held on Wednesday, March 6 and Thursday, March 7, 2024. The public hearing was held in the Mecham Conference Center of the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle, NE, Washington, DC. The purpose of the public hearing was for the Commission to re...
USSC Public Meeting - March 7, 2024
Переглядів 3623 місяці тому
Pursuant to Rule 3.2 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the United States Sentencing Commission, a public hearing was held on Wednesday, March 6 and Thursday, March 7, 2024. The public hearing was held in the Mecham Conference Center of the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle, NE, Washington, DC. The purpose of the public hearing was for the Commission to re...
Criminal Justice Act: Protecting the Right to Counsel for 60 Years
Переглядів 1,4 тис.3 місяці тому
For 60 years, the Criminal Justice Act (CJA) has ensured that defendants who cannot afford to retain an attorney receive professional legal counsel. In commemoration of the passage of the 1964 law, U.S. District Judge Myron H. Thompson gave a keynote address to over 100 federal defenders and CJA panel attorneys at the Edward A. Garmatz U.S. Courthouse, in Baltimore on Feb. 8, 2024. Thompson wit...
Judge Raymond Lohier Shares His Immigration Story and the Diverse Perspective it Brings
Переглядів 1,3 тис.4 місяці тому
Daily life became a verbal obstacle course for the French-speaking, six-year-old Raymond J. Lohier, Jr., when his parents moved him from Montreal, Canada, to the city of Philadelphia. “I've lost my French accent, so many people do who immigrate when they're five or six or seven,” said Judge Lohier, who serves on the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. “But I've never really lost the memories....
In Session: Leading the Judiciary - Episode 37: Why Microstress Matters
Переглядів 4254 місяці тому
In Session: Leading the Judiciary - Episode 37: Why Microstress Matters A transcript of this podcast is available at fjc.dcn/sites/default/files/materials/49/Transcripts_In Session_Leading the Judiciary_Episode 37_Why Microstress Matters.pdf Episode 37: Karen Dillon, co-author with Rob Cross of The Microstress Effect: How Little Things Pile Up and Create Big Problems and What to Do about It, de...
In Session: Leading the Judiciary - Episode 36: Gather with Purpose
Переглядів 5446 місяців тому
In Session: Leading the Judiciary - Episode 36: Gather with Purpose A transcript of this podcast is available at fjc.dcn/sites/default/files/materials/40/Transcript_In Session 36.pdf Episode 36: Today on In Session: Leading the Judiciary, Priya Parker, author of The Art of Gathering, shares a purpose-driven and people-centered approach for designing meaningful and memorable meetings that people...
CJA Panel Attorneys: A Critical Line of Defense
Переглядів 1,4 тис.6 місяців тому
Criminal Justice Act (CJA) panel attorneys are highly qualified, private attorneys who are appointed by the federal court to represent indigent defendants in criminal cases. These lawyers play a critical role in protecting a defendant’s constitutional rights, including their right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment. “I joined the CJA panel because I wanted to be a part of making a difference,...
From the Battlefield to the Bench: Judge Steven Logan
Переглядів 1,5 тис.7 місяців тому
Judge Steven P. Logan’s journey to the bench is a story of valor, perseverance, and determination. The U.S. district judge in Phoenix, Arizona, became the first in his military family to graduate from college. He went on to serve 26 years in the Marine Corps and was awarded the Bronze Star Medal during his time stationed in Iraq. “The time I spent in the Marine Corps, I’d do it a thousand times...
Term Talk (2022-2023): 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis
Переглядів 1,7 тис.8 місяців тому
First Amendment. Public Accommodations. Experts discuss the Supreme Court’s emerging artistic expression exception to public accommodations laws, and the opinion’s potential impact on anti-discrimination laws in general. Participants. Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley School of Law; Tara Grove, Professor and Vinson and...
Term Talk (2022-2023): Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters
Переглядів 4408 місяців тому
Term Talk (2022-2023): Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. Teamsters
Term Talk (2022-2023): National Pork Producers Council v. Ross
Переглядів 9768 місяців тому
Term Talk (2022-2023): National Pork Producers Council v. Ross
Term Talk (2022-2023): Turkiye Halk Bankasi v. United States, Pugin v. Garland
Переглядів 6298 місяців тому
Term Talk (2022-2023): Turkiye Halk Bankasi v. United States, Pugin v. Garland
Term Talk (2022-2023): Smith v. United States, Samia v. United States, In Re Grand Jury
Переглядів 6658 місяців тому
Term Talk (2022-2023): Smith v. United States, Samia v. United States, In Re Grand Jury
In Session: Leading the Judiciary - Episode 35: Focus on What Matters by Subtracting What Doesn’t
Переглядів 5608 місяців тому
In Session: Leading the Judiciary - Episode 35: Focus on What Matters by Subtracting What Doesn’t
Cecilia Altonaga: First Female Cuban American Federal Judge
Переглядів 2,3 тис.8 місяців тому
Cecilia Altonaga: First Female Cuban American Federal Judge
Term Talk (2022-2023): Groff v. DeJoy; Health and Hosp. Corp. of Marion Ctny. v. Talevski
Переглядів 5888 місяців тому
Term Talk (2022-2023): Groff v. DeJoy; Health and Hosp. Corp. of Marion Ctny. v. Talevski
Term Talk (2022-2023): Allen v. Milligan
Переглядів 5259 місяців тому
Term Talk (2022-2023): Allen v. Milligan
Term Talk (2022-2023): Moore v. Harper
Переглядів 3549 місяців тому
Term Talk (2022-2023): Moore v. Harper
Term Talk (2022-2023): Biden v. Nebraska
Переглядів 8549 місяців тому
Term Talk (2022-2023): Biden v. Nebraska
Term Talk (2022-2023): United States v. Texas
Переглядів 5689 місяців тому
Term Talk (2022-2023): United States v. Texas
Term Talk (2022-2023): Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College
Переглядів 1,5 тис.9 місяців тому
Term Talk (2022-2023): Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard College
Off Paper - Episode 25: Finding Happiness in Your Life and Work
Переглядів 4599 місяців тому
Off Paper - Episode 25: Finding Happiness in Your Life and Work
Bankruptcy Courts, and Paths to the Bench
Переглядів 1,8 тис.10 місяців тому
Bankruptcy Courts, and Paths to the Bench
In Session: Leading the Judiciary - Episode 34: Thinking Better to Lead Better
Переглядів 69010 місяців тому
In Session: Leading the Judiciary - Episode 34: Thinking Better to Lead Better
Pathways to the Bench: Diane J. Humetewa
Переглядів 4 тис.10 місяців тому
Pathways to the Bench: Diane J. Humetewa
Court Shorts: The Right to Counsel
Переглядів 3,5 тис.11 місяців тому
Court Shorts: The Right to Counsel

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @MK-cm6xo
    @MK-cm6xo 9 місяців тому

    This man helped cancel To Catch a Predator.

  • @BrowdisThomas-fy9yl
    @BrowdisThomas-fy9yl Рік тому

    Let's talk about set ups in crimes where no one was available in the system of facts to what happened who had experience dealing with the reasons for the difference of business situations dealing with the massive breakdowns to things others like to do because they were forced to be first in discussion leading to those bad examples blames for actions they made up for whatever arrangements of talking about things that others can't get the best answers to like missing persons that happened before hand in the errors to system breakdowns of injustices of using the wrong information to determine facts of false accusations to there work in planning if people use things about positions of no knowledge for years there side of not knowing what professional business environment in bead reports that came from others leaving the scene like hit and run cases

  • @rafaelespinoza6530
    @rafaelespinoza6530 Рік тому

    Christ kitchen Amen 💕🤔

  • @rmazzella5303
    @rmazzella5303 Рік тому

    I’ve always liked Denny the Chin.

  • @sallys.hernandez4260
    @sallys.hernandez4260 Рік тому

    What video I watch for felony embezzlement restitution And expungment

  • @fabianlawstudies9497
    @fabianlawstudies9497 Рік тому

    I love studying law. Thanks for sharing! 👍🏾

  • @pamelakilgore7836
    @pamelakilgore7836 2 роки тому

    Presentations: Excellent. Pamela in Detroit

  • @antarikshasharma
    @antarikshasharma 2 роки тому

    Unlike USA 🇺🇸 India 🇮🇳 doesn't have a Jury System.... It was already abolished long ago in the era of 1950s

  • @hectorabcdefg9076
    @hectorabcdefg9076 2 роки тому

    I wish I could have what it takes to be a pretrial services tech. 16 years working w/ the county courthouse, bilingual, bachelor’s degree. I guess im not smart enough

  • @dwightsandersus60-150417000099
    @dwightsandersus60-150417000099 2 роки тому

    FEDERAL income

  • @pamelakilgore7836
    @pamelakilgore7836 2 роки тому

    God bless you guys for your hard work. I love the law. Pamela in Detroit

  • @pamelakilgore7836
    @pamelakilgore7836 2 роки тому

    2 thumbs up to all you guys........Pamela in Detroit. I love the law!!

  • @styroyou
    @styroyou 2 роки тому

    You have to be willing to sell out your own people, to make it to the bench...Same goes for the Presidency, Supreme Court etc.

  • @corinnajones1067
    @corinnajones1067 2 роки тому

    It seems like the Rule of Law no longer applies. I'm just studying for my citizenship tests, and this is very discouraging. The interpretation by these judges does not quite align with my study guide answer: No one is above the law.

  • @doniellenberg5300
    @doniellenberg5300 2 роки тому

    Ah

  • @ninja.foxy_yt-0453
    @ninja.foxy_yt-0453 2 роки тому

    I Dont Get It?

  • @planetachevere
    @planetachevere 2 роки тому

    Very educational!!!

  • @stevenbritt1227
    @stevenbritt1227 2 роки тому

    Thank you

  • @troygroff2552
    @troygroff2552 2 роки тому

    ❤😂🎉

  • @stevenbritt1227
    @stevenbritt1227 2 роки тому

    This is beautiful. Thank you

  • @brandonharvey7939
    @brandonharvey7939 2 роки тому

    Authorized access ultimately comes from the consent of the governed, who give that authorization to the office exercising its governing duties. Authorization is not given to a specific individual to do as they please with it. If leisurely access is what that individual wants, it must be requested and the People must decide whether or not to grant it. The Supreme Court exceeded their jurisdiction in Van Buren and usurped a power reserved for and by the People.

  • @xModerax
    @xModerax 2 роки тому

    1:00 made me think a fire alarm went off in my house, other than that good video

  • @itstoasty7089
    @itstoasty7089 2 роки тому

    No comments?!?

  • @amotionhighlights8771
    @amotionhighlights8771 2 роки тому

    I’m on probation. I’m 43 years old. I have never committed a crime but I got convicted of a crime for using my 1st amendment rights. My probation officer ignores me and pretends I don’t exist. I imagine he knows I’m not at risk of committing a crime. Probation officers do a really good job. Judges and district attorneys are the ones who are out of control and determined to have a 100% conviction rate so they can get re-elected. Thank God for juries. If no jury is present then you will get convicted. Probation officers see this bull all the time. I think judges should be appointed and not elected.

  • @ChristopherPelaezTellez
    @ChristopherPelaezTellez 2 роки тому

    Wow

  • @JonathanSterlingUSA
    @JonathanSterlingUSA 2 роки тому

    That's not what the law meant when it was written. Nobody understood the law to mean that when it was written. Our Supreme Court changed the meaning of the law. If such decisions stand, the people cannot hold lawmakers accountable for the laws they write. Apparently that's what our Congress wants.

  • @marycolton5024
    @marycolton5024 2 роки тому

    Who protects you when it is the judiciary that is harming you?

  • @tucsonkelly7682
    @tucsonkelly7682 2 роки тому

    We all need to voice our opinions... We are the People

  • @tucsonkelly7682
    @tucsonkelly7682 2 роки тому

    We the People..

  • @josephsadowski4532
    @josephsadowski4532 2 роки тому

    When you have clerks ordering you to remove evidence from the motion you do not have an independent judiciary you have a confined justice system as your manipulating the case before it even starts, and when you have clerks waiting 37 days to order you to remove an order from anothe3r country closing the post office in the United States who is not accepting mail as to the Pandemic, your then manipulating the justice holding off the motion or just dismissing that motion destroying the case, and when you have a clerk's office refusing to file, like Chief Clerk of this court Angela D. Caesar, under 28 U.S. Code § 352 - Review of complaint by chief judge you do not have any independent judiciary as that decision could have and must have come from the Justice itself, as the complaint was against the clerks office for a showing a clerk or two are working for the Lawyerts, which was proven through filings making the clerk's office no better then what was found in 1983 in Illinois when 62 clerks were found guilty of setting up cases and 34 justices working with the justices and the lawyers was a list beyond control with payments to the clerks back in 1983 of $10,000.00 to disrupt a case to get it thrown out, yes the judiciary is as clean as they were and to allow a Judge such as the African in the video to wear a multi color Bow Tie advertizing he is Gay is not showing of independant, it is a showing of disfunction as to the Gay mentality is what was found back in the 70's in the Supreme Court as to being a mentally sick person who belongs in a mental institution, there is no independence in that showing, making the judges to be seen as Bias and Prejudice to the original filings such as the stripping the cases of pictures of injuries in a case, there is no independent justice in any Judiciary as the Judiciary has shown its colors as they are above the Laws of the constitution and will continue to be above the Constitution, as when the House, Congress gave permission to the High C they decided to cut me off, so I have to stop, there is no fair justice as they are people and to believe the appellate court is better, they protect the corruption and dis-allow reality in the courts as to their ways of cleansing the files before they get them.

  • @lucapirazzoli5569
    @lucapirazzoli5569 2 роки тому

    Sounds fun

  • @mohammadkargarian6738
    @mohammadkargarian6738 2 роки тому

    O!

  • @Adventureetcetera
    @Adventureetcetera 3 роки тому

    corrupt system

  • @Adventureetcetera
    @Adventureetcetera 3 роки тому

    ua-cam.com/video/9gRJj5zBgWs/v-deo.html

  • @karrisajoss4271
    @karrisajoss4271 3 роки тому

    I see the hard work talked about to success. I too have worked hard, lost family, career etc, but no success. I am praying some day I could be a judge and do the opposite of what I have experienced as well as give back to the community.

  • @petepolites2923
    @petepolites2923 3 роки тому

    what if your totally innocent and still facing trouble

  • @jahlegion
    @jahlegion 4 роки тому

    One of the most racist judge out there. Remove him asap.

  • @wiredwater7331
    @wiredwater7331 4 роки тому

    they all look deadass dead

  • @wiredwater7331
    @wiredwater7331 4 роки тому

    Why the f is mandatory guidelines unconsitutional? 6th amendment doesn't do ANYTHING

  • @wiredwater7331
    @wiredwater7331 4 роки тому

    lol this michael padilla person salty and tiltedddddd

  • @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807
    @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807 4 роки тому

    I needed to hear this at this point in time. Thank you.

  • @aerionbroadus4244
    @aerionbroadus4244 4 роки тому

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @JJpit
    @JJpit 4 роки тому

    Who else is watching this for their civics class?

  • @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807
    @eleonoraformatoneeszczepan8807 4 роки тому

    Inspiring.

  • @ohdayton2668
    @ohdayton2668 4 роки тому

    nice

  • @augustocsanchez8572
    @augustocsanchez8572 4 роки тому

    Exelente

  • @ruin_critical2329
    @ruin_critical2329 4 роки тому

    Perfection

  • @shjobbi
    @shjobbi 4 роки тому

    Damn, impressive

  • @victorchmura2216
    @victorchmura2216 4 роки тому

    Y'all should stop wasting our money and let people be truly free

  • @AbdulRasheed-go7tq
    @AbdulRasheed-go7tq 4 роки тому

    Worth listening